Ingels SIP - ingelshickmanmills

HICKMAN MILLS C-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Ingels Accelerated Elementary School

2008-2009

MISSION

VISION

DATA ANALYSIS

DISTRICT-CSIP

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

SCHOOL

IMPROVEMENT PLAN

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Accountability

"Greatness is not a question of implementing a new program or addressing the latest trend, but is rather a question of unrelenting perseverance in continuing improvement, a perseverance that is often lacking in school systems."

Jim Collins

Good to Great

The Mission of the Hickman Mills C-1 School District is to

educate our students for a lifetime of success.

HICKMAN MILLS C-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT VISIO N

In order to accomplish the Mission of the Hickman Mills C-1 School District, the Board of Education is committed to:

Educating all students to achieve high levels of academic performance while

fostering positive growth in social and emotional behaviors and attitudes

essential to succeed in our diverse and competitive society.

Involving schools, families, businesses, and community as partners in preparing

our students for lifelong learning.

Securing sufficient resources to provide the best educational opportunities for

students through an equitable financial plan while being cost-responsive.

Hiring and developing administrative, certified, and classified personnel who

recognize and foster the unique academic potential of each student.

Ensuring the most efficient use of district facilities to enhance the learning

environment and academic achievement for our students.

Becoming well-informed on educational and community issues in order to determine the best direction for our school district.

HICKMAN MILLS C-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT

School’s Mission:

Ingels Accelerated Elementary School exists to build a foundation for success by educating all students to practice social responsibility and achieve academic mastery through data driven, explicit and rigorous instruction in partnership with parents and community.

Vision Statement:

The community of Ingels Accelerated Elementary School is committed to:

Increase learning through individualized data-driven instruction
Nurture and recognize abilities
Guide children to achieve in a safe learning environment
Empower students to excel and succeed
Lead by example with love and respect
Support parental and community involvement

Describe the primary focus of the school improvement efforts for the current school year 2007-2008. Include results of efforts – attach data.

The primary focus of the school improvement efforts for the current school year 2007-2008 was as follows: effectively implement the Reading First Program, Collaborative Unit Design and math Investigations training.

Leadership Structure

Briefly describe the process used to update the school improvement plan. Include how decisions were made. List names of leadership team.

A needs assessment was completed by staff. Then our entire staff met in vertical teams to discuss our current plan, assess its effectiveness, and make recommendations for 08-09. Based on identified needs using results from the needs assessment, STAR, DIBELS, unit assessments, MAP and discipline information from the district scorecard, Ingels’ Lead Team met to draft a plan for 08-09. All staff members were invited to participate in this process. Members of the Lead Team included Lisa Smith (Principal), Nancy Ralston (PDC Rep), Tara Matson (P.E.), Joleena Chaffin (Kgn), Marcia Pitts (1^st), Melody Gibeson (2^nd), Camille Gay (3^rd), Paul Hermes (4^th), Nola Fuqua (5^th), and Kelli Washington (Reading First).

Members of the 2008-2009 Lead Team are: Lisa Smith (Principal), Amanda Brown (PDC Rep/Music), Candice Knight (1^st), Melody Gibeson (2^nd), Camille Gay (3^rd), Michele Pippens (Counselor), Cindy Welsh (Media Specialist), Kelli Washington (Reading Coach)

Describe how the plan is to be shared with all stakeholders.

A draft of the plan will be presented to the entire staff and parents through PTA and LINC site council meetings at the end of the year. Parents will be given opportunities to provide additional input regarding parental involvement action steps. The final plan will be posted on the school website. During the 08-09 school year, professional learning community teams will collaborate and create action plans monthly around school-wide data addressing each school improvement goal.

Summary of School Objectives for 2008-2009

Benchmark achievement for K-3 students and on/above grade level for 4^thand 5^th will increase by a minimum of 25% by the end of May 2009 and each subsequent year as demonstrated by the STAR (4^th/5^th)and DIBELS (K-3) assessments.
Math achievement for1-5 students will increase by a minimum of 25 percentby the end of May 2009 and each subsequent year as demonstrated by District Common Math Assessments.
Writing assessment scores for Ingels’ students will increase by a minimum of 10 percentage points by the end of May 2009 and each subsequent year as demonstrated by Step Up to Writing scoring guides.
Office referrals for behavior concerns will decrease by a minimum of 25% by the end of May 2009 and each subsequent year as demonstrated by suspension record reports.

HICKMAN MILLS C-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT

2008-09

Goal: To improve student achievement in the area of reading.

Supports CSIP Goal: Improve student learning and growth - Goal:I Objective 1, 2, 3 Goal : V Objective 1

. Benchmark achievement for K-3 students and on/above grade level for 4^thand 5^th will increase by a minimum of 25% by the end of May 2009 and each subsequent year as demonstrated by the STAR (4^th/5^th)and DIBELS (K-3) assessments.

Baseline Data: Dibels and Star

(Attach data)

Strategy/Action Step	Timeline	MSIP Standard	Person Responsible	Cost/ Resources	Professional Development
Teachers will provide differentiated instruction through effective delivery methods and Robert Marzano’s SBR instructional strategies in collaborative lesson planning and daily instruction.	Sept 08 to May 09	6.1,6.3, 6.4,6.5.6.7	Grade level Teams Principal Coaches	30 books Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One Size Fits All $823.00 07-08 PD Budget 2 Subs paid by PD @ $100/day x 6 days = $1200	Differentiated Instruction SBR strategies PDN – Ensuring Effective Teaching in Every Classroom
Teachers will provide direct, explicit instruction	Sept 08 to May 09	6.1,6.3, 6.4,6.5.6.7	Reading Coach Principal	$0	Explicit Instruction
Embed technology in the curriculum to improve proficiency in data analysis and instruction through the use of smart boards, projectors, DIBELS, RenLearn and Infinite Campus	Sept 08 to May 09	6.4, 6.5, 6.7, 6.8	IT Coaches Reading Coach M. Pitts M. Gibeson	2 facilitators @ $25 paid from PD budget ($50)	Smartboards, Projectors, Clickers, DIBELS, RenLearn, Infinite Campus
Align DOK of learning objectives, activities and assessments through collaborative planning of daily lessons and formative assessments tied to the curriculum	Sept 08 to May 09	6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 9.1	Principal PLC Leadership Team	$0	DOK Alignment

Strategy/Action Step	Timeline	MSIP Standard	Person Responsible	Cost/ Resources	Professional Development
Create common assessments from identified GLE indicators and utilize assessment data to inform instruction and guide instructional improvement.	Oct 08-March 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	PLC Teams Reading Coach Principal	$0	Formative Assessments
Collaboratively analyze student work and assessment data (STAR, DIBELS, ERDA, Reading Horizons) to identify student needs and plan effective interventions (tutoring, flexible grouping, enrichment).	Sept 08-April 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	Reading Coach Reading Specialist PLC Grade level teams	1 facilitator @ $25 08-09 PD Budget	Student Work Protocol Flexible grouping
Collaborate in vertical cadres on school-wide assessments to analyze data and create action plans for improvement.	Oct. 08- May 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	PLC Leadership Team Reading Cadre	1 facilitator @ $25 per 9 sessions Paid from PD budget ($225) Hotel Costs for EDTrust conference ($400)	Data Analysis
Provide an additional 60 minutes of Tier 3 Intervention with a Reading Specialist and Reading Paras utilizing the Reading Horizons	Sept 08-May 09	6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 9.1	Reading Specialist	$0	Reading Horizons
Promote parental involvement through parent night events, PTA, LINC council meetings with data discussions, trainings and literature on SBR strategies to improve student mastery and success.	Aug.08-May 09	7.5. 7.6	PTA Reading Coach Reading Specialist Grade level teams Principal	$0	none
Students and staff will systematically track student learning based on mastery of learning goals, and celebrate successes	Oct 08-May 09		PDN Coaches PLC Teams	$0.00	Learning goals and feedback
Monitor curriculum implementation through administrative walkthroughs and instructional coaching	Aug 08-May 09	6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 9.1	Reading Coach Principal	$0	none

HICKMAN MILLS C-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT

2008-09

Goal: To improve student achievement in the area of mathematics.

Supports CSIP Goal: Improve student learning and growth Objective:I Objective 1, 3 Goal V Objective 1

Objective: (SMART = Specific, measurable, attainable, results oriented and time bound)

Math achievement for1-5 students will increase by a minimum of 25 percentby the end of May 2009 and each subsequent year as demonstrated by District Common Math Assessments.

Baseline Data: Common Assessments

(Attach data)

Strategy/Action Step	Timeline	MSIP Standard	Person Responsible	Cost/ Resources	Professional Development
Teachers will provide differentiated instruction through effective delivery methods and Robert Marzano’s SBR instructional strategies in collaborative lesson planning and daily instruction.	Sept 08 to May 09	6.1,6.3, 6.4,6.5.6.7	Grade level Teams Principal Coaches	30 books Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One Size Fits All $823.00 07-08 PD Budget Subs for PDN $1200 for 2 tchrs @ 6 mtgs ea. 08-09 PD Budget	Differentiated Instruction SBR strategies PDN – Ensuring Effective Teaching in Every Classroom
Teachers will provide direct, explicit instruction	Sept 08 to May 09	6.1,6.3, 6.4,6.5.6.7	Math Coaches Principal	$0	Explicit Instruction
Embed technology in the curriculum to improve proficiency in data analysis and instruction through the use of smart boards, projectors, DIBELS, RenLearn and Infinite Campus	Sept 08 to May 09	6.4, 6.5, 6.7, 6.8	IT Coaches Math Coaches M. Pitts M. Gibeson	2 facilitators @ $25 paid from PD budget ($50)	Smartboards, Projectors, Clickers, DIBELS, RenLearn, Infinite Campus
Align DOK of learning objectives, activities and assessments through collaborative planning of daily lessons and formative assessments tied to the curriculum	Sept 08 to May 09	6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 9.1	Principal Math Coaches	$0	DOK Alignment
Provide at-risk 3^rd-5^th students supplemental math instruction with a Title I Math Specialist	Oct. 08-May 09	6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 9.1	Math Specialist	$0 (pd by Title I and LINC)	Straight Curve Math Fast Math

Strategy/Action Step	Timeline	MSIP Standard	Person Responsible	Cost/ Resources	Professional Development
Create common assessments from identified GLE indicators and utilize assessment data to inform instruction and guide instructional improvement.	Oct 08-March 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	PLC Teams Reading Coach Principal	$0	Formative Assessments
Collaboratively analyze student work and assessment data (district common assessments, Star Math) to identify student needs and plan effective interventions.	Sept 08-April 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	Math Coaches Math Specialist PLC Grade level teams	1 facilitator @ $25 08-09 PD Budget	Examining Student Work Protocol
Collaborate monthly in vertical cadres on school-wide assessments to disaggregate data and create action plans for improvement.	Oct. 08- May 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	PLC Leadership Team Math Cadre	1 facilitator @ $25 per 9 sessions Paid from PD budget ($225) Hotel Costs for EDTrust conference ($400)	Collaborative Data Analysis
Students and staff will systematically track student learning based on mastery of learning goals, and celebrate successes	Oct 08-May 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	PDN Coaches PLC Teams	$0.00	Learning goals and feedback
Promote parental involvement through parent night events, PTA, LINC with data discussions, trainings and literature on SBR strategies to improve student mastery and success.	Aug.08-May 09	7.5 7.6	Grade level teams Principal	$0	none
Monitor curriculum implementation through administrative walkthroughs and instructional coaching	Aug 08-May 09	6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 9.1	Math Coaches Principal	$0	none

HICKMAN MILLS C-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT

2008-09

Goal: To improve student achievement in the area of writing.

Supports CSIP Goal: Improve student learning and growth Goal:I Objective 1, 3 Goal V Objective 1

Objective: (SMART = Specific, measurable, attainable, results oriented and time bound)

Writing assessment scores for Ingels’ students will increase by a minimum of 10 percentage points by the end of May 2009 and each subsequent year as demonstrated by Step Up to Writing scoring guides.

Baseline Data: Baseline data will be established using 08-09 first quarter assessment.

(Attach data)

Strategy/Action Step	Timeline	MSIP Standard	Person Responsible	Cost/ Resources	Professional Development
Implement Step Up to Writing program.	Oct 08-May 09	6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 9.1	Lead Team STARR Teachers	$40.00 (mileage for STARR teacher) Paid with PD budget	Step Up to Writing
Collaboratively plan writing lessons and create formative assessments tied to district curriculum.	Oct 08 to May 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	Lead Team Grade Level Teams	$0.00	Lesson planning
Collaboratively analyze student writing and assessment data to identify student needs and to plan effective interventions.	Oct 08 to May 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	STARR Teacher Grade Level Teams	$0.00	none
Collaborate monthly in vertical teams on school-wide assessments to analyze data and create action plans for success.	Oct 08 to May 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	PLC Leadership Team Writing Cadre	1 facilitator $25.00 @ per Session Paid from PD Budget ($225)	Collaborative Data Analysis
Students and staff will systematically track student learning based on mastery of learning goals, and celebrate successes	Oct 08-May 09	6.2.6.3 6.4,6.5 6.7	PDN Coaches PLC Teams	$0.00	Learning goals and feedback
Promote parental involvement through data discussions and literature with tips on SBR strategies to improve student mastery and success.	Aug. 08 to May 09	7.5 7.6	Grade level teams	$0.00	none
Monitor curriculum implementation through administrative walkthroughs and instructional coaching	Aug 08-May 09	6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 9.1	Principal	$0	none

HICKMAN MILLS C-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT

2008-09

Goal: To improve school climate in the area of student behavior.

Supports CSIP Goal:

Goal: (SMART = Specific, measurable, attainable, results oriented and time bound)

Office discipline referrals will decrease by a minimum of 25 percent by the end of May 2009 and each subsequent year as demonstrated by the district scorecard.

Baseline Data: District Scorecard Indicator

(Attach data)

Strategy/Action Step	Timeline	MSIP Standard	Person Responsible	Cost/ Resources	Professional Development
Staff will complete 12 hours of training by Conflict Mediation Center to learn about Restorative Discipline for Schools to create a culture of peace.	August 08 to Dec 08	6.3, 6.4 6.5, 6.9 7.1, 7.2 9.5, 9.6	Lead Team Conflict Mediation Center	$0.00 (grant paid)	Restorative Discipline Talk It Out Curriculum
Implement class meetings	August 08 to May 09	6.3, 6.4 6.5, 6.9 7.1, 7.2 9.5, 9.6	Lead Team Grade Level Teams	$0.00	Conducting class mtgs
Collaborate monthly with staff , parents and community organizations (CMC, Rosebrooks, Spofford) to identify student needs and to plan and follow up on timely and effective prevention and pyramid of intervention strategies.	Sept. 08 to May 09	6.3, 6.4 6.5, 6.9 7.1, 7.2 9.5, 9.6	Intervention Teams Grade Level Teams	$0.00	none
Collaborate monthly in school-wide vertical teams to disaggregate behavior data (Infinite Campus, district scorecard) , track referral/suspension data and create action plans for improvement.	Oct 08 to May 09	6.3, 6.4 6.5, 6.9 7.1, 7.2 9.5, 9.6	PLC Leadership Team School Climate Cadre	1 facilitator $25 @ per Session Paid from PD budget ($225)	Collaborative data analysis
Implement the Positive Behavior Supports strategies school-wide and incorporate PBS strategies with Fred Jones management strategies.	Aug 08-May 09	6.3, 6.4 6.5, 6.9 7.1, 7.2 9.5, 9.6	School Climate Cadre Principal	$0	PBS System
Monitor curriculum implementation through administrative walkthroughs and instructional coaching	Aug 08-May 09	6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 9.1	CMC Facilitators Principal	$0	none

Overview

* The school's vision statement focuses

directly on student performance.

* The entire plan focuses directly on

student performance.

* The objectives of the plan are

measurable.

* The plan includes improvement

strategies.

* All the strategies will accomplish the

objectives.

* The plan includes some improvement

strategies.

* The school's vision statement addresses

student performance.

* The plan primarily focused on student

performance.

* The objectives of the plan are measurable.

* Many of the strategies will accomplish

the objective.

* The plan includes a few improvement

strategies.

* The school's vision statement mentions

student performance.

* The plan focuses on student

performance to some degree.

* Some of the objectives of the plan are

measurable.

* Some of the strategies will accomplish

the objective.

* The plan includes only maintenance

strategies.

* The school's mission statement

addresses issues other than student

performance.

* The plan focuses on issues other than

student performance.

* Few if any of the objectives are

measurable.

* None of the strategies will accomplish

the objective.

Stakeholders

* All stakeholders (teachers, support

staff, parents, community members,

central office personnel and students) have

an opportunity for input.

* The plan strongly reflects the school

community's needs.

* Communication with stakeholders is

ongoing during the plan's development/

implementation.

* The PDC rep. is linked to the planning

team.

* Most stakeholders have an opportunity for

input.

* The plan reflects the school community's

needs.

* Communication will all stakeholders was

intermittent during the plan's development.

* Most of the time the PDC rep. is linked to

the planning team

* Several stakeholders have an opportunity

for input.

* The plan reflects the school community's

needs to some degree.

* Communication will all stakeholders was

sporadic during the plan's development.

* The PDC rep. is linked to the planning

team to some degree.

* Few stakeholders have an opportunity

for input.

* The plan does not reflect the school

community's needs.

* Communication with all stakeholders

was nonexistent during the plan's

development.

* The PDC rep. is not linked to the

planning team.

Data and

Research

* The team correctly used appropriate hard

and soft data to assess the school.

* The team consistently used quality

research to assist its members in making

decisions.

* The team used hard and soft data to assess

the school.

* The team used quality research to assist its

members in making some decisions.

* The team used soft data to assess the

school.

* The team used quality research to assist

its members in making a few of the

decisions.

* The team used no data to assess the

school.

* The team used poor quality research

to assist its members in making

decisions.

Action Plans

* All of the action plans are realistic (do-

able) and reflect continuous improvement.

* All action plans will directly impact

student performance.

* The action plans are evaluated on an on-

going basis.

* Most of the action plans are realistic (do-

able).

* Most of the plans will impact student

performance.

* The action plans are evaluated intermittently.

* Some of the actions plans are realistic (do-

able).

* Some action plans will impact student

performance.

* The action plans are rarely evaluated.

* Few, if any, of the action plans are

realistic (do-able).

* The action plans will not impact

student performance.

* The action plans are evaluated.

Professional Development

* Professional development is on-going,

job-embedded, and evaluated.

* Professional development is on-going but not

job-embedded and not evaluated.

* Professional development is not on-going,

not job-embedded and not evaluated.

* There is no Professional Development

plan.

Alignment

* The plan aligns with district and building

budgetary constraints.

* The plan aligns with the district CSIP.

* Planned staff development is aligned with

Guidelines for Best Practices in Staff

Development.

* Technology is infused in the plan.

* Parent involvement is infused in the

plan.

* The plan partially aligns with district and

building budgetary constraints.

* Most of the plan aligns with the district CSIP.

* Planned staff development is partially

aligned with Guidelines for Best Practices in

Staff Development.

* Some technology is infused in the plan.

* Parent involvement is a separate part of the

plan.

* The plan partially aligns with district and

building budgetary constraints.

* Some of the plan aligns with the district

CSIP.

* Plan staff development is aligned to some

degree with Guidelines for Best Practices

in Staff Development.

* Technology is a separate part of plan.

* Parent involvement is only a maintenance

issue.

* The plan is incongruent with district

and building budgetary constraints.

* The plan is not aligned with the

district CSIP.

* Planned staff development is not

aligned

Guidelines for Best Practices in Staff

Development.

* No technology is listed in the plan.

* No parent involvement is part of plan.

Data Availability Chart

School Goals	Evidence We Have	Evidence We Need
To improve student achievement in the area of reading.	MAP DIBELS STAR Reading	K-5 Houghton Mifflin OxBox (pre and post)
To improve student achievement in the area of mathematics.	MAP Unit Assessments	Kdgn Assessments Star Math assessments
To improve student achievement in the area of writing.	MAP Needs assessment survey	Step Up to Writing pre and post assessment scoring guides
To improve school climate in the area of student behavior.	Infinite Campus Scorecard Data	School climate surveys (pre and post)

Data-Related Topics to Discuss….

Professional Development Plan 2008-09

Big Ideas to be developed:

Calendar of Events 2008-09

Date	PD Activity and Design	Facilitator/Resource Person(s)	Participants	Evaluation
August 20	Restorative Discipline	Conflict Mediation Center	Whole staff	Response/Reflection Journal
August 27	Tech: Clicker Training Reading First - DIBELS	IT Coaches Reading Coach	3-5 K-2	CPS and DIBELS assessment data
Sept. 3	PLC Overview Lesson Plan Form/MSIP Walkthrough Form	PLC Leadership Team Principal	K-5/ Certified Staff	Collaborative lesson plans
Sept. 10	Collaborative Lesson Planning (focus: DOK alignment)	Principal	K-5/ Certified Staff	Aligned lesson components
Sept. 17	Collaborative Lesson Planning (Investigations)	Principal	K-5/ Certified Staff	Collaborative plans
Sept. 24	Tech: Star Math Webinar HM resource collaboration	Renlearn Rep Grade level chair	1-5 Kdgn teachers	Star Math data Collaboration log
Oct. 1*	Collaborative MAP Crystal Report Analysis	PLC Coaches	K-5/ Certified Staff	Data Analysis Form
Oct. 8	MAPAnalysis: Resource collaboration	PLC Coaches	K-5/ Certified Staff	GLE indicator resource form
Oct. 15*	Collaborative Planning	Grade Level Chairs	K-5 /Certified Staff	Collaborative CA plans
Oct. 22	Vertical Team Data Collaboration & Display	Cadre Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Collaborative Planning Log and Display
Nov. 5*	PLC : Creating CA SMART Goals/Action Plans	PLC Facilitator: Angela Cordier	K-5 All Certified Staff	Vertical Team Goals and Action Plans
Nov. 12	Grade level SMART goals/planning/common assess.	Grade Level Team Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Team goals, action plan, common assessments
Nov. 19	Tech: Smartboard Projector activities/Collaborative planning (scoring guides)	District IT Rep Reading Coach	K-5 All Certified Staff	Collaborative plans w/ scoring guides for common assessmts/Reflection log
Dec. 3*	Collaboratively examine Student Work CA	Reading Coach/Reading Specialist	K-5 All Certified Staff	Grade level protocol w/big ideas
Dec. 10	Collaborative Vertical Team Data Analysis	Team Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Collaborative analysis log and recommendations
Dec. 17*	PLC Teams Share Results, celebrate success, display data	Cadre Leaders PLC Leadership Team Grade level chairs	Whole staff	PD Semester Evaluation Data Displays
Jan. 7*	Vertical Team: Create Math SMART Goals/Action Plans	Math Coaches/PLC Facilitators	K-5 All Certified Staff	Vertical Team goals and action plans
Jan. 14	Grade level SMART goals/planning/common assess	Grade Level Team Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Team goals, action plan, common assessments
Jan. 21*	Tech: United Streaming/Math Websites Collaborative planning	District IT Rep Math Coaches Grade level Teams	K-5 All Certified Staff	Reflection log: application in instruction Collaborative plans
Jan. 28	Collaborative Lesson Planning - Math	Grade level Team Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Collaborative plans
Feb. 4*	Collaboratively examine student work - Math	Grade Level Team Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Collaboration logs
Feb. 11	PLC Teams share results, celebrate success, display data	Cadre Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Data submissions
Feb. 18*	Collaboratively create CA practice tests/scoring guides	Grade Level Team Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	MAP practice tests/scoring guides
Feb. 25	Collaboratively examine student tests - CA	Cadre Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Collaboration logs with reteaching strategies
Mar. 4*	Collaboratively create MA practice tests - MA	Lead Team Facilitator Principal	K-5 All Certified Staff	MAP practice tests/scoring guides
Mar. 11	Collaboratively examine student tests - MA	Grade Level Team Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Collaboration logs with reteaching strategies
Mar. 25	Tech: Infinite Campus grading	Principal	K-5 All Certified Staff	Completed quarter grades
Apr. 1	Vertical Teams: PD Needs survey Collaborative planning	Cadre Leaders Grade level teams	K-5 All Certified Staff	SIP needs survey templates: staff, parents, students Collaborative plans
Apr. 8	Vertical Teams: Review baseline data/create SMART goals 09-10 Collaborative planning	Cadre Leaders Grade level Teams	K-5 All Certified Staff	SIP SMART Goals Collaborative plans
Apr. 15*	Vertical Teams: Strategies/Action Steps 09-10	Cadre Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	SIP Strategies/Action Steps
Apr. 22	Vertical Teams: PD activities 09-10	Cadre Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	SIP PD Activities
Apr. 29	Review SIP and PD Plan 09-10	Cadre Leaders	K-5 All Certified Staff	Completed SIP/Evaluation of SIP process
May 6*	Tech: Parent Resources	District IT Reps	K-5 All Certified Staff	Parent list for summer academic resources
May 13	Data Collaboration	Vertical Teams	K-5 All Certified Staff	Data Summaries
May 20	PD Evaluations/Review Data/Celebrate Success	PDC Rep PLC Teams	K-5 All Certified Staff	Completed evaluations Data submissions

Results of PD efforts (Data included)